LLOYD WHITE, PETITIONER,

v.

BAY DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION CO. ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969)
  …y action in order to timely adjudicate all questions concerning the coverage supplied the insured by the insurer. The fact situations recently encountered in certain cases decided by our Court (e. g., Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co., 1968, 216 So. 2d 436, and Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 1966, 185 So. 2d 689) emphasize the. importance that an injured party plaintiff have the advantage of an ordinary litigant from the moment of injury, i. e., from the accrual of his cause of acti…
• Tiedtke v. Fid. & Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 222 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1969)
  …s from affirming the District Court is the Company’s obvious breach of its concurrent obligation to its insured to inform him of the fact of its disclaimer of liability within a reasonable time. We recognized in Bergh v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co., 216 So. 2d 436 (Fla.1968), that nonwaiver agreements are valid, but coupled this with a cautionary statement that such agreements do not have the unfettered power in all circumstances to supersede the doctrines of waiver and estoppel. Here, the Company informed t…
• SIX L'S Packing Co., Inc. v. Fla. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 268 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
  …P. 2d 316. See also 1 A.L.R.3d 1139-1173. . We have not overlooked plaintiff’s contention that the doctrine of waiver and estoppel may be available even where a nonwaiver clause is involved. Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Ela.1968, 216 So. 2d 436. Whether the insured has waived the nonwaiver clause is immaterial in view of our determination that the doctrine of waiver and estoppel cannot operate to enlarge the coverage of an insurance policy.…