BUCKINGHAM CORP.

v.

ODOM CORP., DBA ARIZONA DISTRIBUTING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1986)
  …eversed.4 The court began by examining the District Court’s eviden-tiary rulings, and determined that much of the evidence excluded by the District Court was in fact admissible. 723 F. 2d, at 260-303. These evidentiary rulings are not before us. See 471 U. S. 1002 (1985) (limiting grant of certiorari). On the merits, and based on the newly enlarged record, the court found that the District Court’s summary judgment decision was improper. The court acknowledged that “there are legal limitations upon the infere…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1986)
• Witters v. Wash. Dep't of Servs. for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1986)
  …ision of aid to petitioner would contravene the Federal Constitution. In light of that ruling, the court saw no need to reach the “entanglement” prong; it stated that the record was in any case inadequate for such an inquiry. We granted certiorari, 471 U. S. 1002 (1985), and we now reverse. II The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment has consistently presented this Court with difficult questions of interpretation and application. We acknowledged in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U. S. 602 (1971), that “we c…