H. C. BROOM & SON, INC. AND MARSH & MCLENNAN, INC., PETITIONERS,

v.

HAROLD C. BROOM, JR., AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Centrust Sav. Bank v. Barnett Banks Tr. Co., N.A., 483 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …cribing the depositor constituted notice to the bank that the account funds might be the property of a third person and could not be set off against depositor’s personal debts. Home Federal Savings & Loan Association of Hollywood v. Emile, Fla.1968, 216 So. 2d 443. G. Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees, § 904 n. 69 (rev.2d ed. 1932). In this case, the appellant savings and loan association argues that the $100,-000 drawn on the guardianship account and used to open the savings trust account contained no…
• The Northside Bank OF Tampa v. Elec. Enters., Inc., 353 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …ignated “Virginia Construction, Inc., Trustee,” such a designation would have constituted notice to the Bank. Cf. Emile v. Bright, 203 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967), affirmed sub nom. Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hollywood v. Emile, 216 So. 2d 443 (Fla.1968). 2. Section 10 — Special designation coupled with other facts. Since there was no special designation of the account, this section is inapplicable to our discussion. 3. Section 11 — Words on deposited check or note indicating third pers…
• Howdeshell v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Clearwater, 369 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  …s were filed, and, of course, did not address those defenses. Although in some instances such defenses as pled may merely raise “paper issues”, and summary judgment may still be proper, Home Federal Saving's & Loan Association of Hollywood v. Emile, 216 So. 2d 443 (Fla.1968); Reflex, N.V. v. Umet Trust, 336 So. 2d 473 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), the burden is on the moving party to show lack of any genuine issue of material fact. Without any eviden-tiary submission by appellee to refute the affirmative defenses, appel…