ZEISLER

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Rivera, 944 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …); United States v. Cummiskey, 728 F. 2d 200, 205 (3d Cir.1984) (stating that "when the action of remaining silent occurs after the witness has received Miranda warnings, that action is not relevant as a prior inconsistent assertion"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1005, 105 S.Ct. 1869, 85 L.Ed.2d 162 (1985); State v. Vild, 155 Ariz. 374, 746 P. 2d 1304 (Ct.App.1987). .The government argues that the decisions of this circuit establish that evidence concerning a defendant’s actions does not constitute a comment on s…
• United States v. Taylor, 800 F.2d 1012 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …to give an essay on the basis of the objection. In my view, it was sufficient for him to indicate that he was objecting because Mr. Nave was an agent of the government. See United States v. Cummiskey, 728 F. 2d 200, 205 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1005, 105 S.Ct. 1869, 85 L.Ed.2d 162 (1985). Because the objection was adequate, two matters remain to be considered. The first concerns the question of the relationship between Mr. Nave and the government when he undertook to have “conversations” with…
• United States v. Paradis, 802 F.2d 553 (1st Cir. 1986)
  …use, bodily injury to another person; (3) with intent to retaliate against any person for, inter alia, providing information relating to the commission of a federal offense. United States v. Cummiskey, 728 F. 2d 200, 206 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1005, 105 S.Ct. 1869, 85 L.Ed.2d 162 (1985). Count 6 reads: On or about February 9, 1985, in the District of New Hampshire, Norman Beliveau, the defendant, did knowingly and intentionally engage in conduct and attempt to engage in conduct which threaten…