ANTONELLI

v.

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Thomason v. State, 620 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1993)
  …that trial court should “consider and correctly evaluate the alternatives to a mistrial”); Abdi v. Georgia, 744 F. 2d 1500, 1503 (11th Cir.1984) (record must disclose that trial court considered alternatives before declaring mistrial), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1006, 105 S.Ct. 1871, 85 L.Ed.2d 164 (1985); Grandberry v. Bonner, 653 F. 2d 1010, 1014 (5th Cir.1981) (retrial permitted where record indicates trial judge carefully considered the alternatives and did not act in an abrupt, erratic, or precipitate manne…
• Clark v. State, 756 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …necessary because of inappropriate remarks or conduct by a defendant or defense counsel, even if defense counsel objects and the defendant does not waive his double jeopardy rights. In Abdi v. Georgia, 744 F. 2d 1500 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1006, 105 S.Ct. 1871, 85 L.Ed.2d 164 (1985), the court reversed an order granting habeas corpus relief to a defendant who claimed a double jeopardy defense after a mistrial was declared when his defense counsel asked questions specifically prohibited by…
• Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159 (U.S. 1985)
  …of incriminating statements obtained in good faith by the Government even after an indictment at a trial involving an offense different from that covered by the indictment. See, e. g., Mealer v. Jones, 741 F. 2d 1451, 1455 (CA2 1984), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1006 (1985); United States v. Lisenby, 716 F. 2d 1355, 1357-1359 (CA11 1983) (en banc). Applying Hoffa to the facts of this case, it is clear that the statements obtained by Colson could have been introduced against respondent at a subsequent trial for…

  ← 1 / 2 →