CARMEN MEITEN, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
GROVELAND PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., BOSTON-OLD COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
CARMEN MEITEN, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT,
GROVELAND PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., BOSTON-OLD COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONERS
216 So. 2d 453
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission dated January 4, 1968. After argument and our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, records and briefs, we have reached the conclusion that the Florida Industrial Commission’s Order does not deviate from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition herein filed are therefore denied.
Petitioner Meiten’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Painter v. Bd. OF Pub. Instruction OF Dade Cnty., 223 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1969)…they are supported by competent substantial evidence. * * * Under this rule neither this Court nor the Full Commission m'ay substitute its judgment for that of the Deputy Commissioner * * Justice Hopping in Orendorff v. Refrigerated Transport, Inc., 216 So. 2d 453 (Fla.1968). “The full commission, while it has the statutory obligation to affirm, reverse, modify or remand, must do so, so far as factual matters are concerned, on the basis of the findings of fact of the deputy and not on the separate substituted…
-
Esau Williams v. Alfred S. Austin Constr. Co., 224 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 1969)…he Full Commission substitutes its judgment for that of the Judge of Industrial Claims it transcends limitations of its own scope of review. See Paul v. Toddle House Corporation, 206 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1968), Orendorff v. Refrigerated Transport, Inc., 216 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1968), and Painter v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, Fla., 223 So. 2d 33 (Opinion filed May 14, 1969). Substantial evidence means such evidence as a reasonable man would accept as adequate to support á conclusion. See DeGroot v.…
-
Presher v. J. Quick Trucking, 453 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…was reasonable to expect him to go to the aid of a co-worker if, as contended by claimant, that was in fact the custom in this employment. Julian v. Port Everglades Terminal Co., 135 So. 2d 423 (Fla.1961); Orendorff v. Refrigerated Transport, Inc., 216 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1968). The decision of the deputy commissioner is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ„ concur.…