LEE BELLOFF, APPELLANT,
v.
DS-MS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION D/B/A THE CADET HOTEL, APPELLEE
LEE BELLOFF, APPELLANT,
DS-MS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION D/B/A THE CADET HOTEL, APPELLEE
216 So. 2d 477
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Reichenbach v. New Almanac Hotel Corporation, 141 Fla. 797, 194 So. 250 (1940); Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 746.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Holmes, 256 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)…52; Ferlita v. Jones, 1905, 50 Fla. 218, 39 So. 593; Stephens v. Anderson, 1918, 75 Fla. 575, 79 So. 205; City of Miami v. Thigpen, 1943, 151 Fla. 800, II So. 2d 300; Conrad v. Jackson, Fla.1959, 107 So. 2d 369; Wilkins v. Tebbetts, Fla.App.3d 1968, 216 So. 2d 477; Town of Medley v. Caplan, Fla.App.3d 1966, 191 So. 2d 449. The Florida Bar, Evidence in Florida (Florida Practice Manual No. 13, 1971), §§ 2.7, 11.4. . Tipp v. Dist. of Columbia, 1939, 69 App. D.C. 400, 102 F. 2d 264. . Annot., 5 A. & E. Ann.Cas.…
-
Holmes v. State, 273 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1972)…Town of Medley v. Caplan, 191 So. 2d 449 (Fla.App.3d, 1966), when the District Court determined that the trial court had, inter alia, held to be unconstitutional an ordinance not entered into evidence before the trial court. In Wilkins v. Tebbetts, 216 So. 2d 477 (Fla.App.3d, 1968), and Applied Research Laboratories of Florida, Inc. v. Homer, 249 So. 2d 732 (Fla.App.3d, 1971), the District Court repeated its holding of Town of Medley, but in none of the cases did the District Court reverse the application of…
-
United States Fire Ins. Co. v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 134 So. 3d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…tnik, 923 So. 2d 537, 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (citing Tres-AAA-Exxon v. City First Mortg., Inc., 870 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)). The trial court must take all well-pleaded facts as true, Barentine, 328 So. 2d at 879 (citing Wilkins v. Tebbetts, 216 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)), and “the court’s sole inquiry is whether the complaint states a cause of action,” Hammond, 522 So. 2d at 522 (citing Appel v. Scott, 479 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)).5 If a party refers to a document within the complaint,…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Reichenbach v. New Alamac Hotel Corp., 141 Fla. 797 (Fla. 1940)
- Raphael v. Koretzky, 102 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)