NEW YORK

v.

SMITH; BROWN V. UNITED STATES, IN RE ANDERSON, TESCH, SHERIFF OF CASS COUNTY, NEBRASKA, ET AL. V. MCCURRY ET AL., KOKER ET UX. V. SAGE ET AL.; BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND DBA WES OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. V. NEW JERSEY ET AL.; GERZOF V. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT; COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORP. V. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD; FINCH ET AL. V. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 926 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
  …nst Finch for fraud. The judgment was affirmed on appeal. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 57 Md.App. 190, 469 A. 2d [*1576] 867, cert. denied, 300 Md. 88, 475 A. 2d 1200 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1215, 105 S.Ct. 1190, 84 L.Ed.2d 336 reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1049, 105 S.Ct. 2043, 85 L.Ed.2d 341 (1985). In 1980, during the pendency of that state court action in Maryland, Finch filed a five-count cross-claim against Hughes, his co-defendant in a federal action, Civil No. 79-2236, by Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm…
• Austin v. City OF Bisbee, 855 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …lity may be extended retroactively to Garcia’s date of decision. Congress obviously intended retroactivity. It dated the onset of liability one year from the issuance of Garcia’s mandate on April 15, 1985 (when the petition for rehearing was denied, 471 U.S. 1049). Also, the Senate Report’s arguments for protecting states and localities from the hardship of FLSA compliance apply with equal force before and after November 1985. [I]t is essential that the particular needs and circumstances of the States and t…