YOUNG

v.

LEHMAN, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Ofchinick, 877 F.2d 251 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …Inasmuch as the amendment to the guideline is intended to clarify the existing guideline, we may give it substantial weight in determining the meaning of the existing guideline. See Barnes v. Cohen, 749 F. 2d 1009, 1015 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1061, 105 S.Ct. 2126, 85 L.Ed.2d 490 (1985). . Judge Higginbotham concurs in the result.…
• United States v. Berkowitz, 927 F.2d 1376 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …y of using either force or deception to compel him to open the door and submit to the arrest. Instead, Berkowitz’s action in [*1399] opening the door was completely voluntary. See United States v. Morgan, 743 F. 2d 1158 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1061, 105 S.Ct. 2126, 85 L.Ed.2d 490 (1985), where a sheriffs use of spotlights and a bullhorn in compelling the defendant to appear at his mother’s front door rendered the arrest invalid; see also United States v. Johnson, 626 F. 2d 753 (9th Cir.1980),…
• United States v. Sangineto-Miranda, 859 F.2d 1501 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 750, 104 S.Ct. 2091, 2097-98, 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984). See also United States v. Morgan, 743 F. 2d 1158, 1162 (6th Cir.1984) (“the burden is on the government to demonstrate exigency”) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1061, 105 S.Ct. 2126, 85 L.Ed.2d 490 (1985).6 The Supreme Court has recognized only a few emergency circumstances excusing the need for a warrant. See, e.g., United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42-43, 96 S.Ct. 2406, 2409-10, 49 L.Ed.2d 300 (1976) (ho…

  ← 1 / 2 →