GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
v.
THOMAS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
THOMAS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
471 U.S. 1074
Supreme Court of the United States (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 39 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
United Techs. Corp. v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, 821 F.2d 714 (D.C. Cir. 1987)…rules from its notice and comment procedures. 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A) (1982). The meaning of this exclusion was amplified by the court sitting en banc in General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F. 2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074, 105 S.Ct. 2153, 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985), in which certain general principles were set forth to be used in determining whether or not a rule is interpretative. As a starting point, the court found that the agency’s characterization of a rule is “relev…
-
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Bush, 918 F.2d 1323 (7th Cir. 1990)…ncy’s interpretation as reasonable), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1055, 108 S.Ct. 2820, 100 L.Ed.2d 922 (1988); General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F. 2d 1561, 1565-67 (D.C.Cir.1984) (applying Chevron deference to an interpretive rule), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074, 105 S.Ct. 2153, 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985); Chrysler Corp. v. EPA, 631 F. 2d 865, 884 (D.C.Cir.) (according EPA's interpretation important significance), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1021, 101 S.Ct. 589, 66 L.Ed.2d 483 (1980). . It must be emphasized that th…
-
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 823 F.2d 1554 (D.C. Cir. 1987)…m the House Report is seen as speaking with complete clarity, the fact remains that committee reports, even authoritative committee reports,33 are not law. General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F. 2d 1561, 1570 n. 13 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074, 105 S.Ct. 2153, 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985). Accordingly, we decline the Commission’s invitation. We will not permit a committee report to trump clear and unambiguous statutory language. Rather, because there is no ambiguity on the face of the statute,3…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence