DESEYN

v.

MUSKINGUM WATERSHED CONSERVANCY DISTRICT

Citator

Cited By

• Hatcher v. Bd. OF Pub. Educ. & Orphanage FOR Bibb Cnty., 809 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …enfroe court held that the district court properly entered judgment for the defendants “on the ground that there was no violation of plaintiffs federal rights.” Id. at 715. The court in Berry v. Bailey, 726 F. 2d 670 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 2326, 85 L.Ed.2d 844 (1985), applied the Pickering balancing test in deciding that a discharged public employee's first amendment [*1557] rights were not violated. In Holley v. Seminole County School Dist., 755 F. 2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1985)…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Kurtz v. Vickrey, 855 F.2d 723 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …e, rather than to the single question relating to a matter of public concern. 461 U.S. at 149-54, 103 S.Ct. at 1691-94. . The Eiland court relied on Connick and drew further support from Berry v. Bailey, 726 F. 2d 670 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 2326, 85 L.Ed.2d 844 (1985). As the court in Eiland explained: Berry involved a situation where a police officer was fired allegedly in retaliation for his speech in relation to an incident involving political supporters of the sheriff.…
• Finch v. City OF Vernon, 877 F.2d 1497 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …t Finch was terminated because he refused to prepare for a celebration in the City Square. Finch could have been discharged lawfully for failing to comply with the orders of his superior. Berry v. Bailey, 726 F. 2d 670 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1101, 105 S.Ct. 2326, 85 L.Ed.2d 844 (1985). The evidence does not point so strongly in favor of the City’s explanation, however, that reasonable men could not reach a contrary verdict. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s ve…