CALVERT

v.

SHARP

Citator

Cited By

• West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (U.S. 1988)
  …l punishment.5 West alleged that Atkins was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, by failing to provide adequate treatment. Relying on a decision of its controlling court in Calvert v. Sharp, 748 F. 2d 861 (CA4 1984), cert. denied, 471 U. S. 1132 (1985), the District Court granted Doctor Atkins’ motion for summary judgment. In Calvert, the Fourth Circuit held that a private orthopedic specialist, employed by a nonprofit professional corporation which provided services under contract to the i…
• McNASBY v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 832 F.2d 47 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …limited award and the Commission’s decision was affirmed by the Pennsylvania courts. Murphy v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm’n, 77 Pa. Commw. 291, 465 A. 2d 740 (1983), aff'd, 506 Pa. 549, 486 A. 2d 388 (1985), appeal dismissed, 471 U.S. 1132, 105 S.Ct. 2669, 86 L.Ed.2d 689 (1985). On September 29, 1982, while the state court appeals were pending, McNasby and twelve other members of an asserted class of female employees of Crown Cork filed this action in federal court against Crown Cork…
• McNASBY v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 888 F.2d 270 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …vania Supreme Court, which also affirmed. See Murphy v. PHRC, 506 Pa. 549, 486 A. 2d 388 (1985). Next, plaintiffs appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. See Murphy v. PHRC, 471 U.S. 1132, 105 S.Ct. 2669, 86 L.Ed.2d 689, (1985). C. The District Court Proceedings In December 1985, the case was placed back on the active list in the district court. Defendants moved to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment, on the ground…