AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO.

v.

LAVOIE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (U.S. 1986)
  …New York Times applies. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that that requirement need not be considered at the summary judgment stage. 241 U. S. App. D. C. 246, 746 F. 2d 1563 (1984). We granted certiorari, 471 U. S. 1134 (1985), because that holding was in conflict with decisions of several other Courts of Appeals, which had held that the New York Times requirement of clear and convincing evidence must be considered on a motion for summary judgment.1 We now reverse.…
• Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 (U.S. 1986)
  …ecision not to provide a remedy, in view of its strong interest in protecting its prison officials from liability, did not violate due process. Three judges dissented, essentially embracing the position of the District Court. We granted certiorari, 471 U. S. 1134 (1985), and set this case for oral argument with Daniels v. Williams, ante, p. 327. Finding the principles enunciated in Daniels controlling here, we affirm. In Daniels, we held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is not implica…
• California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1986)
  …e home” which violated respondent’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Id., at 1089-1090, 208 Cal. Rptr., at 98 (footnote omitted). The California Supreme Court denied the State’s petition for review. We granted the State’s petition for certiorari, 471 U. S. 1134 (1985). We reverse. The State argues that respondent has “knowingly exposed” his backyard to aerial observation, because all that was seen was visible to the naked eye from any aircraft flying overhead. The State analogizes its mode of observation…