GRAVES

v.

GARRAGHTY, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …e and the drugs sniffed out by the drug dog. It was not an inventory search. If the inevitable discovery exception could be applied in the instant case as it was in Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1138, 105 S.Ct. 2681, 86 L.Ed.2d 699 (1985), and in State v. McLaughlin, 454 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), the exception would effectively swallow up the exclusionary rule. Anytime property in a closed container, belonging to an arrestee, came into the…
• United States v. Nichols, 841 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …States v. Grismore, 546 F. 2d 844 (10th Cir.1976). Also, a court may properly deny a defendant’s choice of counsel if that attorney is licensed to practice only in a different state. Williams v. Nix, 751 F. 2d 956, 959-60 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1138, 105 S.Ct. 268, 86 L.Ed.2d 699 (1985); Ford, 701 F. 2d at 692-93; but see United States v. Panzardi Alvarez, 816 F. 2d 813, 815-18 (1st Cir.1987) (local rule limiting out-of-state attorneys to one pro hac vice appearance annually fails to advance in…
• Winford L. Stokes, Jr. v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …77 U.S. at 485-89, 106 S.Ct. at 2644-46 (counsel’s inadvertent failure to include issue on appeal to state supreme court held not to satisfy the cause requirement of Wainwright v. Sykes)) Williams v. Nix, 751 F. 2d 956, 960 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1138, 105 S.Ct. 2681, 86 L.Ed.2d 699 (1985) (attorneys’ “asserted unawareness of the applicable state rule of practice” did not amount to cause for failure to preserve claim in state court). In sum, “counsel’s failure to raise a particular claim on appe…