ROSE

v.

FLORIDA; NASH, AKA HENDERSON V. ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Hunter v. State, 660 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1995)
  …sest scrutiny, it is still the obligation of an appellate court to review with caution the exercise of experienced discretion by a trial judge in matters such as a motion for a continuance.” Rose v. State, 461 So. 2d 84, 87 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1143, 105 S.Ct. 2689, 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985); see also Magill v. State, 386 So. 2d 1188 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 927, 101 S.Ct. 1384, 67 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981). Hunter was indicted on October 6, 1992, and counsel was appointed shortly thereafter. H…
• Rose v. State, 675 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1996)
  …, 76 L.Ed.2d 812 (1983), wherein we affirmed Rose’s convictions and vacated his death sentence and remanded for resentencing. Upon resentencing, the death sentence was reimposed and we affirmed. Rose v. State, 461 So. 2d 84 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1143, 105 S.Ct. 2689, 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985). In his subsequent rule 3.850 motion, Rose challenged the lawfulness of his conviction and death sentence on a variety of grounds. The trial court summarily denied Rose’s motion without conducting an evidentia…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Sochor v. State, 619 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1993)
  …t (1) the trial was so unfair that fundamental error occurred and (2) the contemporaneous objection rule has less force in a capital case. This Court has previously rejected the second argument. Rose v. State, 461 So. 2d 84 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1143, 105 S.Ct. 2689, 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985); see Pope v. Wainwright, 496 So. 2d 798 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 951, 107 S.Ct. 1617, 94 L.Ed.2d 801 (1987); Jones v. Wainwright, 473 So. 2d 1244 (Fla.1985). [*290] As to the first argument, fundament…

Authorities Cited

• Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)