LESTER DANIELS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1968-12-20
No. 68-322
LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
216 So. 2d 762 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1968)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence. The defendant had pleaded guilty to robbery while represented by counsel and was aware of the charges and consequences.


Holding

No, the trial court did not err in denying the motion to vacate the judgment and sentence.


Key Quotes

“We have carefully considered the arguments propounded by appellant and find them to be without merit.”

Establishes the appellate court's conclusion regarding the defendant's arguments.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The defendant, represented by privately retained counsel, pleaded guilty to robbery. Subsequently, he filed a motion to vacate the judgment and senten…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guilty Plea cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, files this appeal from an order of the court below denying his Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence brought under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Appellant was informed against for the crime of robbery. He plead guilty to the information while being represented by privately retained counsel. From the record it is shown that appellant was well aware of the charge against him and the consequences of his plea of guilty.

We have carefully considered the arguments propounded by appellant and find them to be without merit. Finding no error on the record we therefore affirm the ruling of the trial court denying his Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence. See Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 834.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw