PRENTICE

v.

ILCHERT, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …organizer, or a supervisor, or held some management role, not all three.” Id. Furthermore, the terms organizer, supervisor, or manager are to be given their ordinary meaning, United States v. Wilkinson, 754 F. 2d 1427, 1431 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1019, 105 S.Ct. 3482, 87 L.Ed.2d 617 (1985), and it is irrelevant that other persons may have exercised supervision superior to the defendant’s, United States v. Becton, 751 F. 2d 250, 254-55 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018, 105 S.Ct. 3480, 8…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Murad Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …t must successfully bear “the heavy burden of showing that he suffered substantial prejudice due to the joint trial, amounting to a miscarriage of justice.” United States v. Bari, 750 F. 2d 1169, 1177 (2d Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1019, 105 S.Ct. 3482, 87 L.Ed.2d 617 (1985). Nevertheless, the appellant’s heavy burden notwithstanding, we are not unaware of the dangers of prejudice inherent in large conspiracy trials. In cases where many defendants are tried at once under a single…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …ar, however, the plain error doctrine is to be used sparingly. See United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 15, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985); Kallash, 785 F. 2d at 29; United States v. Wilkinson, 754 F. 2d 1427, 1432 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1019, 105 S.Ct. 3482, 87 L.Ed.2d 617 (1985); United States v. London, 753 F. 2d 202, 205 (2d Cir.1985). Despite the inclination to invoke the doctrine more freely where constitutional error might otherwise pass without correction, furthermore, it is esta…