HUENE ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• United States v. Ochs, 842 F.2d 515 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …1973); or where extrinsic factors in the record make it clear that, although the jury could have relied on an insufficient ground, it did not, in fact, do so. See, e.g., United States v. Alexander, 748 F. 2d 185, 189-90 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1027, 105 S.Ct. 3501, 87 L.Ed.2d 632 (1985). Not surprisingly, the government urges that this case falls within the Jacobs/Alexander exception. The government further asserts that in applying the exception, we are bound by the plain error standard of Fe…
• Dolen E. Lindsey v. Am. Cast Iron Pipe Co., 810 F.2d 1094 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …ed the availability of prejudgment interest awards under the ADEA. See, e.g., O’Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F. 2d 1543, 1552 (11th Cir.1984); Heiar v. Crawford County, Wisconsin, 746 F. 2d 1190, 1200 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1027, 105 S.Ct. 3500, 87 L.Ed.2d 631 (1985); Criswell v. Western Airlines, Inc., 709 F. 2d 544, 556-57 (9th Cir.1983), aff'd on other grounds, 472 U.S. 400, 105 S.Ct. 2743, 86 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). Thus, we find that prejudgment interest is available as a…
• Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 831 F.2d 1321 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …rawford County, 746 F. 2d 1190, 1202 (7th Cir.1984) (suggesting that liquidated damages under the ADEA may have been intended “in whole or part to compensate victims of willful violations for other items of damage, such as delay ..."), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1027, 105 S.Ct. 3500, 87 L.Ed.2d 631 (1985). Our reasoning here is based on the particular method under the ADEA of calculating liquidated damages. Therefore, our decision today does not suggest that prejudgment interest may not be allowed in addition…