SIXTA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Nelson v. Fulcomer, 911 F.2d 928 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …t of the government’s investigation at the time of his conversations with the government informant; he was not under arrest and no indictment or other formal charges had been filed. Thus, his Sixth Amendment rights had not attached.”), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029, 105 S.Ct. 3506, 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985). Nelson is in precisely the same situation. Indeed, not only had not Nelson been arraigned or indicted at the time of the confrontation, he had not even been arrested for the rape and murder. Under these circu…
• United States v. Salisbury, 983 F.2d 1369 (6th Cir. 1993)
  …and provide a sound explanation of the applicable law to aid the jury in reaching its decision. Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools, 825 F. 2d 1004, 1010-1011 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Martin, 740 F. 2d 1352, 1361 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029, 105 S.Ct. 3506, 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985). A reviewing court may reverse a judgment if the instructions, viewed in their entirety, were confusing, misleading and prejudicial. Beard v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines, 900 F. 2d 71, 72-73 (6th Cir.1990); Kitch…
• Story v. Green, 978 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …inated at any time”); see also Jones v. Reagan, 748 F. 2d 1331, 1338-39 (9th Cir.1984) (merchant seamen’s “property right” to free medical care extinguished by Congress’s repeal of benefit; due process and takings challenges rejected), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1029, 105 S.Ct. 3505, 87 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985). In sum, when the statute that once authorized the benefit in question is repealed, any property right in that, benefit is extinguished. In the present case, prior to 1991, plaintiffs were entitled to be free…