FULTON ET AL.

v.

COLLINS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• Grossman v. State, 525 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1988)
  …nding the jury recommendation, whether it be for life imprisonment or death, the judge is required to make an independent determination, based on the aggravating and mitigating factors. Randolph v. State, 463 So. 2d 186,192 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 907, 105 S.Ct. 3533, 87 L.Ed.2d 656 (1985); Engle v. State, 438 So. 2d 803, 813 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1074, 104 S.Ct. 1430, 79 L.Ed.2d 753 (1984); Ross v. State, 386 So. 2d 1191,1197 (Fla.1980). Moreover, this procedure has been previously…
• Bryan v. State, 533 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1988)
  …en if relevant, should not be admitted if its probative value is substantially outweighed by undue prejudice. Our later case law reiterates the controlling importance of relevancy. In Randolph v. State, 463 So. 2d 186, 189 (Fla. 1984), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 907, 105 S.Ct. 3533, 87 L.Ed.2d 656 (1985), we reexamined Williams and stated: In that case the Court laid down the test of the admissibility of such evidence as being one of relevancy. Even if the evidence in question tends to reveal the [*747] commis…
• Gore v. State, 599 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 1992)
  …ses from the courtroom. “The trial judge is endowed with a sound judicial discretion to decide whether particular prospective witnesses should be excluded from the sequestration rule.” Randolph v. State, 463 So. 2d 186, 191 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 907, 105 S.Ct. 3533, 87 L.Ed.2d 656 (1985). Of course, should the witness’ presence cause some prejudice to the accused, the witness should not be allowed to remain in the courtroom. Where the rule has been invoked, a hearing should be conducted to dete…