GONZALEZ-MARES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Rolling v. State, 695 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1997)
  …987) (finding defendant's oral motion for change of venue on first day of voir dire was timely and approving trial court’s denial of motion only after parties began to impanel a jury); Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 67, 69 n. 1 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 913, 105 S.Ct. 3540, 87 L.Ed.2d 663 (1985) (stating that ruling on change of venue should not be made prior to jury selection because impartial jury may be seated if trial court finds credible the assurances of prospective jurors that they can set aside…
• Gudinas v. State, 693 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1997)
  …we agree with the State that this issue is procedurally barred. Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 67, 71 (Fla.1984) (stating that “[i]n the absence of fundamental error the failure to object precludes consideration of this point on appeal”), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 913, 105 S.Ct. 3540, 87 L.Ed.2d 663 (1985). However, Gudinas appears to be claiming fundamental error, citing Francis v. State, 413 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla.1982), for the proposition a defendant has the “constitutional right to be present at the stages…
• Hansbrough v. State, 509 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1987)
  …Delay v. State, 440 So. 2d 1242 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1264, 104 S.Ct. 3569, 82 L.Ed.2d 860 (1984), the mere mention of a polygraph examination is not necessarily reversible error. Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 913, 105 S.Ct. 3540, 87 L.Ed.2d 663 (1985); Sullivan v. State, 303 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 3226, 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976). After reviewing this record, we do not find that this witness’ mention of a polygraph examinat…