DENSMORE

v.

CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA, ET AL.; JOHNSON V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD; SUTER V. UNITED STATES; HOLDERMAN V. UNITED STATES; HOLDERMAN V. UNITED STATES; JARRELL V. BALKCOM, WARDEN; BROGDON V. LOUISIANA; GREGORY V. MARYLAND; BOCOOK V. TATE; ZARRILLI V. BRAUNSTEIN; HAAS V. NICHOLS ET AL.; CERVI V. KEMP, WARDEN; SAVAGE V. CITY OF COLUMBUS; WESER V. MASCHNER ET AL.; STEWART V. ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Brogdon v. Butler, 824 F.2d 338 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …State v. Brogdon, 457 So. 2d 616 (La.1984). Brogdon filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, and the petition was denied on May 13, 1985. Brogdon v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1111, 105 S.Ct. 2345, 85 L.Ed.2d 862, reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 921, 105 S.Ct. 3547, 87 L.Ed.2d 670 (1985). Brogdon filed his first petition for habe-as corpus relief in July, 1985, in Louisiana district court. That court and the Louisiana Supreme Court both denied relief. Brogdon then petitioned for a writ of habe…
• Cervi v. Kemp, 855 F.2d 702 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …on the murder count remained in effect. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 28, 1985. Cervi v. Kemp, 471 U.S. 1131, 105 S.Ct. 2666, 86 L.Ed.2d 282 (1985). The Supreme Court [*705] denied rehearing on July 1, 1985. Cervi v. Kemp, 473 U.S. 921, 105 S.Ct. 3548, 87 L.Ed.2d 671 (1985). On January 24, 1986, Cervi filed a petition for federal habeas relief in the Southern District of Georgia.7 On February 17, 1987, the district court denied relief on all but two grounds (the confession issue…
• United States v. Czajak, 909 F.2d 20 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …(5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961, 102 S.Ct. 2036, 72 L.Ed.2d 484 (1982). Probation revocation hearings consist of two analytically different components. See Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611, 105 S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636, reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 921, 105 S.Ct. 3548, 87 L.Ed.2d 671 (1985); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). The first stage is wholly retrospective, and focuses on the factual question of whether the probationer has violated one of the conditi…