WAMBLE ET AL.

v.

BENNETT, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …improper, albeit fair reply to defense attacks on the prosecutor’s integrity in maintaining prosecution). See also United States v. Oxman, 740 F. 2d 1298, 1303 (3d Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub. nom. United States v. Pflaumer, 473 U.S. 922, 105 S.Ct. 3550, 87 L.Ed.2d 673 (1985) (disapproving of a prosecutor’s suggestion that he might be “personally disadvantaged” if it were determined that a government witness had disregarded the truthful testimony proviso of his plea agreement). Whil…
• United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …, 473 U.S. 479, 105 S.Ct. 3275, 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985); see also Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades, 741 F. 2d 511 (2d Cir.1984) (plaintiff required to show injury flowing from “pattern” rather than from individual racketeering acts), vacated and remanded, 473 U.S. 922, 105 S.Ct. 3550, 87 L.Ed.2d 673 (1985). The Sedima Court observed that RICO is to be read broadly. This is the lesson not only of Congress’ self-consciously expansive language and overall approach, see United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 586-8…
• Bankers Tr. Co. v. Rhoades, 859 F.2d 1096 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …to state a claim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(c) and 1962 because it had not suffered “a distinct RICO injury” from defendants’ alleged RICO violation, was vacated by the Supreme Court. Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades, 741 F. 2d 511 (2d Cir.1984), vacated, 473 U.S. 922, 105 S.Ct. 3550, 87 L.Ed.2d 673 (1985). This time the issues are different, but they still focus upon whether Bankers can press its civil RICO action against these defendants. First, does Bankers lack standing to bring a civil RICO action against t…

  ← 1 / 2 →