EARL'S PUMP & SUPPLY CO., INC., ET AL.

v.

COLBERG, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Ill. Commerce Comm'n & Patrick W. Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 848 F.2d 1246 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
  …to determine where they can be deregulated consistent with the policies of Congress.” Id.; see also Illinois Commerce Comm’n v. ICC, 749 F. 2d 875, 885 (D.C.Cir.1984) (deregulation through exemption process overriding purpose of Act), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820, 106 S.Ct. 70, 88 L.Ed. 2d 57 (1985); Coal Exporters Ass’n v. United States, 745 F. 2d 76, 82 (D.C.Cir.1984) (exemption provision intended to give ICC very broad authority to eliminate unnecessary regulation), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1072, 105 S.Ct.…
• Zola W. Rittenhouse v. Mabry, 832 F.2d 1380 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …the exercise of jurisdiction over defendants, inter alia, with “lands and tenements” in Mississippi. See Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Cooley, 462 So. 2d 696 (Miss.1984) (discussing attachment basis of jurisdiction), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820, 106 S.Ct. 70, 88 L.Ed.2d 57 (1985); Gough v. Mabsco, Inc., 335 So. 2d 910, 911 (Miss.1976) (attachment case). This basis of jurisdiction cannot apply to MRPC because nothing in the record suggests that it owns any property in Mississippi. However,…
• Integrity Mgmt. Int'l, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc., 836 F.2d 485 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …explicit agency statement. See Grocery Mfrs. of America v. Gerace, 755 F. 2d 993 (2d Cir.1985) (finding preemption where state statute in direct conflict with valid federal regulation), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801, 106 S.Ct. 36, 88 L.Ed.2d 29, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820, 106 S.Ct. 69, 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986). We express no opinion on what other circumstances, if any, would justify a finding of preemption in the face of agency silence. . See, e.g., Cincinnati Elec. Corp. v. Kleppe, 509 F. 2d 1080, 1089 (6th Cir.1975)…