HAMPTON

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Murad Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …have actually committed, a specific substantive offense. They merely must have agreed to interfere with or to obstruct one of the government’s lawful functions. See United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F. 2d 1366, 1382 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 825, 106 S.Ct. 82, 88 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986). Thus, the fact that Maktabi, as an individual bank customer, had no duty to report transactions over $10,000 is not the operative issue as to whether he agreed to unlawfully defraud the United States by impairin…
• United States v. Beverly, 913 F.2d 337 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …515, 107 L.Ed.2d 516 (1989); United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F. 2d 1366, 1378 (2d Cir.) (dual-object conspiracy conviction upheld where evidence was sufficient under one object but may have been insufficient under second object), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 825, 106 S.Ct. 82, 88 L.Ed.2d 67 (1985); United States v. Papadakis, 510 F. 2d 287, 297-98 (2d Cir.) (multi-object conspiracy conviction upheld where one object was not supported by evidence but other object was), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 950, 95 S.Ct. 16…
• United States v. Woody F. Lemons, 941 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …341, 347 (5th Cir.1991). “The chief danger raised by a multiplicitous indictment is the possibility that the defendant will receive more than one sentence for a single offense.” United States v. Swain, 757 F. 2d 1530, 1537 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 825, 106 S.Ct. 81, 88 L.Ed.2d 66 (1985). “Moreover, ‘[wjhether a continuous transaction results in the commission of but a single offense or separate offenses ... is determined by whether separate and distinct prohibited acts, made punishable by law, ha…