ZLOMKE

v.

FLYING TIGER LINE, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Glenna, 878 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …oul of Miranda, every federal circuit court that has addressed the question has reached the opposite conclusion. See Cody v. Solem, 755 F. 2d 1323, 1330 (8th Cir.) (“Simply put, a consent to search is not an incriminating statement.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833, 106 S.Ct. 104, 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985); Smith v. Wainright, 581 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (5th Cir.1978) (“A consent to search is not a self-incriminating statement.”); United States v. Lemon, 550 F. 2d 467, 472 (9th Cir.1977) (“A consent to search is not the…
• United States v. Hidalgo, 7 F.3d 1566 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …v. Rodriguez-Garcia, 983 F. 2d 1563, 1568 (10th Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Lewis, 921 F. 2d 1294, 1303 (D.C.Cir.1990); United States v. Glenna, 878 F. 2d 967, 971 (7th Cir.1989); Cody v. Solem, 755 F. 2d 1323, 1330 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833, 106 S.Ct. 104, 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985); Lemon, 550 F. 2d at 472); see also United States v. Faruolo, 506 F. 2d 490, 495 (2d Cir.1974). We reject Hidalgo’s contrary contention on this issue. B. THE SIXTH AMENDMENT ISSUE Hidalgo next argues that, beca…
• Howard v. Pung, 862 F.2d 1348 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …rted by the record as a whole. See Stone, 428 U.S. at 494 & n. 36, 96 S.Ct. at 3052 & n. 36 (citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 313, 83 S.Ct. 745, 757, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963)); see also Cody v. Solem, 755 F. 2d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 833, 106 S.Ct. 104, 88 L.Ed.2d 84 (1985); Hines v. Auger, 550 F. 2d 1094, 1097 (8th Cir.1977). The state court found that Howard consented to the entry by the police, noting that he had given them a house key to enable them to search the premises, and…