MAZAK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rodriguez, 968 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …s, see United States v. Marquez, 909 F. 2d 738, 740 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 957, 112 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1991), or the denial is an abuse of discretion, see United States v. Figueroa, 757 F. 2d 466, 475-76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 840, 106 S.Ct. 122, 88 L.Ed.2d 100 (1985). In his plea allocution, Rodriguez gave no indication that he was pleading guilty in order to secure favorable treatment for Pacheco. Rather, he stated that he “want[ed] to plead guilty to get this over with.”…
• United States v. Marquez, 909 F.2d 738 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …he seized assets. Discussion On a Rule 32(d) motion to withdraw a guilty plea, a defendant has the burden of persuading the trial court that valid grounds for withdrawal exist, United States v. Figueroa, 757 F. 2d 466, 475 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 840, 106 S.Ct. 122, 88 L.Ed.2d 100 (1985), and the court’s decision that the burden has not been met will be reversed only if clearly erroneous, United States v. Michaelson, 552 F. 2d 472, 475 (2d Cir.1977). [*741] 1. Marquez contends, first, that his p…
• United States v. Corky Nunez, 877 F.2d 1470 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …. It should be noted that the government had no duty to establish probable cause as to each inter-ceptee. It is sufficient that there was probable cause to tap the phone. United States v. Figuero, 757 F. 2d 466, 470-71 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 840, 106 S.Ct. 122, 88 L.Ed.2d 100 (1985); see e.g., United States v. Diltz, 622 F. 2d 476, 482-83 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Russo, 527 F. 2d 1051, 1056 (10th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 2226, 48 L.Ed.2d 831 (1976), reh. deni…