BRADY

v.

PETTIT, FORMER MAYOR OF LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• Morse v. State, 604 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …notice to leave. Under the particular and unusual facts of this case, we find no reason to expand the good-faith exception in the context of a warrantless search. See United States v. Milian-Rodriguez, 759 [*503] F. 2d 1558 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 474 U.S. 845, 106 S.Ct. 135, 88 L.Ed.2d 112 (1985); United States v. Baker, 894 F. 2d 1144, 1147 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Curzi, 867 F. 2d 36, 44 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Winsor, 846 F. 2d 1569, 1579 (9th Cir.1988). Cf. United States v. De Leo…
• Gaeta Cromwell, Inc. v. Banyan Lakes Vill., 523 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …the court stated that dilution occurs “when the use of a name or mark by a subsequent user will lessen the uniqueness of the prior user’s name or mark.” In Freedom Savings and Loan Association v. Way, 757 F. 2d 1176, 1186 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845, 106 S.Ct. 134, 88 L.Ed.2d 110 (1985) (citations omitted), the court stated that [dilution requires some proof that the use of a trademark decreases its commercial value. If the plaintiff holds a distinctive trademark, it is enough that [*626] the…
• Great S. Bank v. First S. Bank, 601 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …llage, 523 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 531 So. 2d 1353 (Fla.1988). On the other hand, arbitrary or fanciful names receive the greatest protection. In Freedom Savings and Loan Association v. Way, 757 F. 2d 1176 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845, 106 S.Ct. 134, 88 L.Ed.2d 110 (1985), the court stated: An arbitrary or fanciful mark is a word in common usage applied to a service unrelated to its meaning; “Sun Bank” is such an arbitrary or fanciful mark when applied to banking services. Id.…