AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO.

v.

OBAD

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Matter of Interest on Tr. Accounts: a Petition to Amend the Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar, 538 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1989)
  …tr. 305 (Ct.App.) (holding that California’s mandatory IOTA program does not involve a taking of property without just compensation, as prohibited by the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution), cert, denied sub nom. Chapman v. State Bar, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 142, 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985). A decade ago, in In re Interest on Trust Accounts, 356 So. 2d at 799, this Court concluded that the creation of the IOTA program was within the Court’s constitutional authority to regulate the practice of law.…
• Hester v. Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, 941 F.2d 1574 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …the object that is sought to be obtained by the federal law and the character of the obligations imposed by it reveal a strong federal purpose. Tectonics, Inc. v. Castle Const. Co., 753 F. 2d 957, 961 (11th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 143, 88 L.Ed.2d 118 (1985). Given the extensive federal regulation of labor-management relations, collective bargaining agreements in particular, and the fact that the TVA is a United States government corporation, existing solely by vir…
• United States v. Rodriguez, 943 F.2d 215 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 18, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1047-48, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Defendant does not suggest that there was no basis in fact for the cross-examination, see United States v. Curcio, 759 F. 2d 237, 240-41 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 142, 88 L.Ed.2d 117 (1985), and a trial judge's evidentiary rulings are not subject to reversal unless the judge acted arbitrarily or irrationally. The scope of cross-examination lies within the broad discretion of the trial court. See, U…