CHAPMAN

v.

SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Doering v. Union Cnty. Bd. OF Chosen Freeholders, 857 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …losing party is not subjected to financial ruin.’ ”) (quoting Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., 579 F.Supp. 657, 664 (S.D.N.Y.1984), aff'd, 757 F. 2d 465 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Chapman v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc., 474 U.S. 850 (1985)); Brown v. Federation of State Medical Boards, 830 F. 2d 1429, 1439 (7th Cir.1987); Oliveri, 803 F. 2d at 1281 (approving the district court’s reducing sanction against attorney from $51,000 to $5,000 because of his financial condition); Matt…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re P & E Boat Rentals, Inc. v. Ennia Gen. Ins. Co., 872 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …sound discretion of the trial judge,” and on review his conduct “will be measured against a standard of fairness and impartiality.” Cranberg v. Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., 756 F. 2d 382, 391 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 763 F. 2d 416, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850, 106 S.Ct. 148, 88 L.Ed.2d 122, reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097, 106 S.Ct. 872, 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1985). We address each of Chevron’s allegations against this standard. First, Chevron contends that the district court erroneously rejected its motion to li…
• Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc., 840 F.2d 236 (4th Cir. 1988)
  …ular interest is a “security” is both a question of subject matter jurisdiction and an element of appellants’ asserted claims under the federal securities laws. See Futura Development Corp. v. Centex Corp., 761 F. 2d 33, 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 850, 106 S.Ct. 147, 88 L.Ed.2d 121 (1985); AVC Nederland B.V. v. Atrium Investment Partnership, 740 F. 2d 148, 152-53 (2d Cir.1984); Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F. 2d 404, 415 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897, 102 S.Ct. 396, 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981). M…