BURTON

v.

STOUTS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hart v. Stagner, 935 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …ther individual jurors were prejudiced by pretrial publicity, the district court was not required to order production of the entire record unless Hart could not produce it himself. See Austad v. Risley, 761 F. 2d 1348, 1353 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 856, 106 S.Ct. 163, 88 L.Ed.2d 135 (1985). Hart made no showing that he attempted to obtain the complete record yet was unable to do so.…
• United States v. Rodriguez, 915 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …rom there to North Dakota. Nahon also testified that the firearm had been manufactured in Michigan by Bauer. The evidence established a sufficient nexus to interstate commerce. Cf. United States v. Glass, 761 F. 2d 479, 480 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 856, 106 S.Ct. 161, 88 L.Ed.2d 134 (1985). IV. Finally, Rodriguez contends that the district court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal because he was entrapped into selling the narcotics. He argues that the government’s failure to pr…
• Cummings v. United States, 831 F.2d 779 (8th Cir. 1987)
  …States v. Glass, 720 F. 2d 21, 22 (8th Cir.1983) (Manifest injustice was the district court standard for permitting postsentencing plea withdrawal before the 1983 amendment to rule 32(d).), aff'd after remand, 761 F. 2d 479 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 856, 106 S.Ct. 161, 88 L.Ed.2d 134 (1985). Manifest injustice arises from “ ‘a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice’ or [from] ‘an omission inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of fair procedure.’ ” Baker…