JOHNSON
v.
TEXAS; BONHAM V. TEXAS; LEWIS V. ILLINOIS; THOMPSON V. TEXAS; FLAMER V. DELAWARE; ROACH V. MARTIN, WARDEN, ET AL.; WALKER V. GEORGIA; DUFF-SMITH V. TEXAS; BROWN V. FRANCIS, WARDEN; MATHIS V. KEMP, WARDEN; JOHNSON V. FLORIDA; HOPKINSON V. WYOMING; DICK V. GEORGIA; BURDEN V. KEMP, WARDEN; DAMON V. SOUTH CAROLINA; STAFFORD V. OKLAHOMA; PROVENS V. MORRIS, SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; OATS V. FLORIDA; GRAYSON V. ALABAMA; PINKERTON V. MCCOTTER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; POYNER V. VIRGINIA; POYNER V. VIRGINIA
JOHNSON
TEXAS; BONHAM V. TEXAS; LEWIS V. ILLINOIS; THOMPSON V. TEXAS; FLAMER V. DELAWARE; ROACH V. MARTIN, WARDEN, ET AL.; WALKER V. GEORGIA; DUFF-SMITH V. TEXAS; BROWN V. FRANCIS, WARDEN; MATHIS V. KEMP, WARDEN; JOHNSON V. FLORIDA; HOPKINSON V. WYOMING; DICK V. GEORGIA; BURDEN V. KEMP, WARDEN; DAMON V. SOUTH CAROLINA; STAFFORD V. OKLAHOMA; PROVENS V. MORRIS, SUPERINTENDENT, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL.; OATS V. FLORIDA; GRAYSON V. ALABAMA; PINKERTON V. MCCOTTER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; POYNER V. VIRGINIA; POYNER V. VIRGINIA
474 U.S. 865
Supreme Court of the United States (1985)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 61 cases
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (59 total)
-
Sochor v. State, 619 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 1993)…of killing is one to which the factor of heinousness is applicable.” Tompkins v. State, 502 So. 2d 415, 421 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1033, 107 S.Ct. 3277, 97 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987). Accord Johnson v. State, 465 So. 2d 499 (Fla.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 186, 88 L.Ed.2d 155 (1985); Doyle v. State, 460 So. 2d 353 (Fla.1984). The trial court properly found this aggravating factor. We disagree, however, that the murder was committed in a cold, calculated, and premeditated manner. Although…
-
Thompson v. State, 619 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1993)…he requirements of section 90.801(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), and was admissible. The prior testimony was also admissible to support the State’s case and to rebut Thompson’s defense. See Johnson v. State, 465 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 186, 88 L.Ed.2d 155 (1985). In his fourth claim, Thompson alleges that the trial court improperly admitted, at the penalty phase, the photographs of the victim’s body taken during the autopsy. Thompson alleges that the trial court’s admi…
-
Hildwin v. State, 531 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1988)…ert. denied, 479 U.S. 1101, 107 S.Ct. 1330, 94 L.Ed.2d 181 (1987). See also Tompkins v. State, 502 So. 2d 415, 421 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3277, 97 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987); Johnson v. State, 465 So. 2d 499, 507 (Fla.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865, 106 S.Ct. 186, 88 L.Ed.2d 155 (1985). The aggravating circumstance that the killing was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel was established by the evidence in the record beyond a reasonable doubt. Issue V: The finding that the killing was comm…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 59 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)