UNITED STATES

v.

QUINN

Citator

Cited By

• Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1986)
  …, supra. However, evidence of his past adaptability was admitted through testimony of his former wife, [*4] his mother and his own testimony. This contention is without merit.” 285 S. C. 42, 48, 328 S. E. 2d 58, 61-62 (1985). We granted certiorari, 474 U. S. 900 (1985), to consider petitioner’s claim that the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision is inconsistent with this Court’s decisions in Lockett and Eddings, and we now reverse. There is no disputing that this Court’s decision in Eddings requires tha…
• Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321 (U.S. 1986)
  …t had not done so for delays from pretrial motions. Ibid. Judge Ferguson dissented, relying on the Act’s legislative history and the interpretations of other Circuits. Id., at 625-626. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Circuits.6 474 U. S. 900 (1985). We now affirm. [*326] II The Speedy Trial Act requires that a criminal trial must commence within 70 days of the latest of a defendant’s indictment, information, or appearance, barring periods of ex-cludable delay. United States v. Rojas-Co…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Ind. Fed'n of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447 (U.S. 1986)
  …ember of the Court of Appeals panel concurred in the judgment solely on the ground that there was insufficient proof that cooperation with insurers was an element of dental services as to which dentists would tend to compete. We granted certiorari, 474 U. S. 900 (1985), in order to consider the Commission’s claim that in vacating the Commission’s order the Court of Appeals misconstrued applicable principles of antitrust law and “‘misapprehended or grossly misapplied’ the substantial evidence test,” American…