MATRIX ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL.

v.

MILLINGTON TELEPHONE CO., INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Patrian Smith v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 632 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …e selection process itself represents defense counsel’s mental .impressions and legal opinions as to how the evidence in the documents relates to the issues and defenses in the litigation.” Sporck v. Peil, 759 F. 2d 312, 315 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903, 106 S.Ct. 232, 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985). In Sporck, the Third Circuit held that the selection and compilation of documents by counsel in preparation for pretrial discovery fell within the “highly-protected category of opinion work product,” because id…
• OLD Holdings, Ltd. v. Taplin, Howard, Shaw & Miller, P.A., 584 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So. 2d 1042 (Fla.1987); State v. Rabin, 495 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Skorman v. Hovnanian of Florida, Inc., 382 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Sporck v. Peil, 759 F. 2d 312 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903, 106 S.Ct. 232, 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985). Respondents’ contention that the attorney client privilege was waived because it was not asserted until raised in a motion for rehearing is without merit. See Gross v. Security Trust Co., 462 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 4…
• Bette Lee Erstling Gardner v. Manor Care OF Boca Raton, Inc., 831 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …l documents are not attorney work product, “the selection process itself represents defense counsel’s mental impressions and legal opinions as to how the evidence in the documents relates to the issues and defenses in the litigation”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903, 106 S.Ct. 232, 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985). The order in the case at bar requires petitioner’s counsel to “cull” through various surveys and personnel files to determine which ones are relevant, and this grouping may indicate counsel’s strategy. However…

  ← 1 / 3 →