MARRAPESE

v.

RHODE ISLAND ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Dement v. Richmond, 845 F.2d 451 (4th Cir. 1988)
  …very least, appellants have alleged sufficient facts to preclude summary judgment on that issue. See Scaglione v. Communications Workers of America, Local 1395, 586 F.Supp. 1018, 1021-22 (D.Mass.1983), aff'd, 759 F. 2d 201 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 921, 106 S.Ct. 251, 88 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985); Deboles v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 350 F.Supp. 1274, 1290-91 (E.D.Pa.1972). In reaching this conclusion, we find especially persuasive the Second Circuit’s recent decision in King v. New York Telephone Co.…
• United States v. Rogers, 960 F.2d 1501 (10th Cir. 1992)
  …pe of cross-examination so much that it prevents the jury from having sufficient information to make a ‘discriminating appraisal’ of the relevant issue.” Tapia, at 1559. See also, United States v. Atwell, 766 F. 2d 416 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 921, 106 S.Ct. 251, 88 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985) (district court has discretion to limit the scope of cross-examination, and such limitations are reversible only if found clearly prejudicial to the defendant). The record indicates that any and all interruptio…