MCCOTTER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

v.

MUNIZ

Citator

Cited By

• Moore v. Kemp, 824 F.2d 847 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …d.; see also Muniz v. Procunier, 760 F. 2d 588, 590 (5th Cir.) (decision of new Fifth Circuit that the Supreme Court, in Estelle v. Smith, saw the State’s conduct “as violating clearly established constitutional law”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 934, 106 S.Ct. 267, 88 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985). Holdings of the former Fifth Circuit are binding upon this court unless overruled by an en banc decision. See Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F. 2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc) (adopting as binding pre…
• Jones v. Dugger, 839 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …. The court, applying Smith, found that the introduction of the psychiatrists’ testimony nevertheless violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights. Id. at 103, n. 6 (citing Muniz v. Procunier, 760 F. 2d 588 (5th Cir.) (same result), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 934, 106 S.Ct. 267, 88 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985)); see also Gholson, 675 F. 2d at 739-42 (same result); White v. Estelle, 720 F. 2d 415 (5th Cir.1983) (hypothetical questions directed at examining psychiatrist interfered with defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights…

  ← 1 / 2 →