WOODSIDE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WOODSIDE

v.

HOERNER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. LUK, 859 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …judge had no business issuing a warrant.’ ” (citation omitted)); United States v. Accardo, 749 F. 2d 1477, 1481 (11th Cir.) (warrant authorizing search of “all corporate records” not “so facially deficient” as to preclude good faith), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949, 106 S.Ct. 314, 88 L.Ed.2d 295 (1985).12 The reasonableness of the executing officers’ reliance is buttressed by the expertise of Assistant United States Attorney Rossbacher, who assisted Agent Koplik in drafting the affidavit and who actually prepa…
• United States v. Traitz, 871 F.2d 368 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …10 Appellants’ contention is meritless. The advice of counsel defense, “based on good faith reliance on an attorney’s advice[,] requires full disclosure of all the material facts. United States v. Martorano, 767 F. 2d 63, 66 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949, 106 S.Ct. 348, 88 L.Ed.2d 296 (1985). It must be remembered that the advice of counsel defense is meant to be available only to those who, after full and honest disclosure of the material facts surrounding a possible course of action, seek and obta…