MARTORANO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Norton, 867 F.2d 1354 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …emanded to the district court to determine whether the facts supported the application of the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. See United States v. Accardo, 749 F. 2d 1477 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Pinckard v. United States, 474 U.S. 949, 106 S.Ct. 314, 88 L.Ed.2d 295 (1985). After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied the appellants’ motion to suppress on the grounds that the law enforcement agents reasonably relied in good faith on the warrants. The appellants eventu…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Espinosa, 827 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …2d 569, 571-72 (9th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 816, 81 S.Ct. 697, 5 L.Ed.2d 694 (1961). Absent a proper objection, we would review the instructions only for plain error. United States v. Appoloney, 761 F. 2d 520, 522 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949, 106 S.Ct. 348, 88 L.Ed.2d 296 (1985). This case both illustrates the difficulties of determining whether a party has made the court fully aware of a purported objection to an instruction under Brown and Martinelli, and the perils of failing to lod…
• United States v. Lehder-Rivas, 955 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …able that Mississippi law enforcement personnel seeking a search warrant would follow Mississippi procedural rules rather than federal procedural rules. See id. at 872; United States v. Accardo, 749 F. 2d 1477, 1480-81 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 949, 106 S.Ct. 314, 88 L.Ed.2d 295 (1985). The lower court therefore properly admitted evidence obtained from the search of the safety deposit box. F. Publicity did not deprive appellants of fair trial Appellants claim that in the wake of inflammatory…