CRESPO-DIAZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. McLAIN, 823 F.2d 1457 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055, 106 S.Ct. 792, 88 L.Ed.2d 770 (1986). To allow such compellingly prejudicial evidence would be an abuse of discretion by the trial court. United States v. Padilla-Martinez, 762 F. 2d 942 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 952, 106 S.Ct. 320, 88 L.Ed.2d 302 (1985). Sher claims that the loansharking and bookmaking counts against McLain and himself were improperly joined with the drug counts against McLain. “The government is not required to prove that a conspirator had fu…
• United States v. Eyster, 948 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …premises. On September 1, 1989, the government filed a response alleging lack of standing. The district court ruled that Marshall’s motion to suppress was defective under United States v. Richardson, 764 F. 2d 1514, 1527 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 952, 106 S.Ct. 320, 88 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985), which held that a motion to suppress must in every critical respect, including allegations of standing, be “sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural to enable the court to conclude that a s…
• United States v. Marmon Dennis Record, 873 F.2d 1363 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …r if it was "inextricably intertwined” with the charged crime such that a witness' testimony "would have been confusing and incomplete without mention of the prior act." United States v. Richardson, 764 F. 2d 1514, 1521-22 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 952, 106 S.Ct. 320, 88 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985). Record’s statement to Jamieson, although during the time of the charged conspiracy, fits into neither of these categories, so we will analyze its admission under Rule 404(b) as involving an extrinsic act. . "A…