BYKOFSKY

v.

HESS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Ala., Inc., 898 F.2d 1556 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …that an action is arbitrary and capricious as a matter of law subject to de novo review. See, e.g., Harris v. Pullman Standard, Inc., 809 F. 2d 1495, 1499 (11th Cir.1987); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); McKnight v. Southern Life & Health Ins. Co., 758 F. 2d 1566, 1569 (11th Cir.1985); Helms v. Monsanto Co., 728 F. 2d 1416 (11th Cir.1984). But Guy should not be read so literally. The discussion following the…
• Olan Jett v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Ala., Inc., 890 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …assumed. See Harris v. Pullman Standard, Inc., 809 F. 2d 1495, 1499 (11th Cir.1987) (this Court finding denial of benefits “arbitrary and capricious as a matter of law”); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985) (applying arbitrary-and-capricious standard de novo); Sharron v. Amalgamated Ins. Agency Services, Inc., 704 F. 2d 562, 567 n. 11, 567-69 (11th Cir.1983) (same).3 Because the Court’s implicit standard of review…
• GUY v. Se. Iron Workers' Welf. Fund, 877 F.2d 37 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …ther it was right.’ ” Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.) (quoting Griffis v. Delta Family-Care Disability, 723 F. 2d 822, 825 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1242, 104 S.Ct. 3514, 82 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985). Factors taken into account include “(1) uniformity of construction; (2) ‘fair reading’ and reasonableness of that reading; and (3) unanticipated costs.” Id. (quoting Dennard v. Richards Group, Inc., 681 F. 2d 3…