TUDOR

v.

GLAESMAN ET UX.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Olan Jett v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Ala., Inc., 890 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …assumed. See Harris v. Pullman Standard, Inc., 809 F. 2d 1495, 1499 (11th Cir.1987) (this Court finding denial of benefits “arbitrary and capricious as a matter of law”); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985) (applying arbitrary-and-capricious standard de novo); Sharron v. Amalgamated Ins. Agency Services, Inc., 704 F. 2d 562, 567 n. 11, 567-69 (11th Cir.1983) (same).3 Because the Court’s implicit standard of review…
• GUY v. Se. Iron Workers' Welf. Fund, 877 F.2d 37 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …ther it was right.’ ” Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.) (quoting Griffis v. Delta Family-Care Disability, 723 F. 2d 822, 825 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1242, 104 S.Ct. 3514, 82 L.Ed.2d 823 (1984)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985). Factors taken into account include “(1) uniformity of construction; (2) ‘fair reading’ and reasonableness of that reading; and (3) unanticipated costs.” Id. (quoting Dennard v. Richards Group, Inc., 681 F. 2d 3…
• Young v. Standard OIL (Indiana) & Amoco Oil Co., 849 F.2d 1039 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ourt will reverse a benefit determination only if it was arbitrary and capricious. 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.; Adcock v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 822 F. 2d 623 (6th Cir.1987); Anderson v. CIBA-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); Sly v. P.R. Mallory & Co., Inc., 712 F. 2d 1209 (7th Cir.1983). Plaintiffs contend the defendants’ decision to deny benefits should be subject to a more stringent “good faith” standard of review whereby Amoco’s…