KAR PRODUCTS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BERT L. ACKER, APPELLEE
KAR PRODUCTS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
BERT L. ACKER, APPELLEE
217 So. 2d 599
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1969)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
This interlocutory appeal having been found to be without substantial merit for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this court rendered in the companion case of Kar Products, Inc. v. Bert L. Acker, 217 So.2d 595, which has this day been filed, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
V. S. v. B. M., 281 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…to draw any such assumption. See, also, Kennelly v. Davis, 216 So. 2d 795 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1968); Sacks v. Sacks, 254 So. 2d 572 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1971); Lorenz v. Jiminez, 163 So. 2d 500 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1964). The appellant relies on B. S. B. v. B. S. F., 217 So. 2d 599 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1969), but that case, on a close examination, is clearly not in point. There is a vast difference in the law between annulment and divorce. There the child was conceived out of wedlock and legally born out of wedlock following the annu…
Authorities Cited
- KAR Prods., Inc. v. Acker, 217 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)