EISSA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Balascsak, 873 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …; see also United States v. Adams, 771 F. 2d 783, 789 (3d Cir.) (“convicted” as used in the dangerous special offender provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3575-78 includes guilty verdicts and pleas that have not been implemented by a judgment), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1013, 106 S.Ct. 545, 88 L.Ed.2d 474 (1985). The Court in Dickerson then turned to the question whether the expunction of the state court’s record nullified the conviction for purposes of the federal statute. It noted that the face of the statute contain…
• Perry v. A.L. Lockhart, 871 F.2d 1384 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …ng numerous procedural errors during his Arkansas State court trial. On May 14, 1986, Perry filed a special supplement to his petition, challenging the validity of the death sentence under Collins v. Lockhart, 754 F. 2d 258 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1013, 106 S.Ct. 546, 88 L.Ed.2d 475 (1985). The district court found no error undermining Perry’s conviction, but held that the death sentence was invalid under Collins and ordered that the State either resentence Perry or reduce his sentence to life wit…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Ritter v. Thigpen, 828 F.2d 662 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …first time after the earlier habeas petition was filed may excuse the failure to raise that claim in the first petition. See, e.g., Moore v. Kemp, 824 F. 2d 847 (11th Cir.1987) (en banc). Collins v. Lockhart, 754 F. 2d 258 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1013, 106 S.Ct. 546, 88 L.Ed.2d 475 (1985), and other Eighth Circuit cases that petitioner cites cannot constitute “new law” in this Circuit to excuse petitioner’s failure to raise the overlap claim in his 1983 habeas petition. Cases in the Eleventh Circ…