WANSONG

v.

WANSONG

Citator

Cited By

• Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591 (6th Cir. 1989)
  …vil rights cases against states and state employees, we understand Rule 9(a) to require plaintiffs to properly allege capacity in their complaint. See Nix, 879 F. 2d at 431 (citing Rose v. Nebraska, 748 F. 2d 1258, 1262 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1014, 106 S.Ct. 547, 88 L.Ed.2d 476 (1985)); cf. C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1293, at 392 (1969) (in actions against the United States, plaintiffs must plead facts showing their right to sue the sovereign). Our require…
• NIX v. Norman, 879 F.2d 429 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …d to show the jurisdiction of the court. The Eleventh Amendment presents a jurisdictional limit on federal courts in civil rights cases against states and their employees. Rose v. State of Nebraska, 748 F. 2d 1258,1262 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1014, 106 S.Ct. 547, 88 L.Ed.2d 476 (1985). That being the case, Rule 9(a) appears to require Nix to make a capacity stipulation in the complaint. [*432] Nix also argues that the district court erred in refusing to modify its original order or to allow h…
• Benny Earl Farrell v. Klein Tools, Inc., 866 F.2d 1294 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …Y. Stores, Inc., 749 F. 2d 1423, 1436-37 (10th Cir.1984), cert. granted and vacated on other grounds sub nom., City of Lawton v. Lusby, 474 U.S. 805, 106 S.Ct. 40, 88 L.Ed.2d 33, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818, 106 S.Ct. 65, 88 L.Ed.2d 53, reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1014, 106 S.Ct. 548, 88 L.Ed.2d 476 (1985); Sanderson v. Chapman, 487 F. 2d 264, 267 (9th Cir.1973); and Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Freeman, 229 F. 2d 547, 551 (10th Cir.1955). In support of its position Klein makes a convincing case that th…