HAMILTON
v.
CALIFORNIA
HAMILTON
CALIFORNIA
474 U.S. 1016
Supreme Court of the United States (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kearns v. C.A. Turner, 837 F.2d 336 (8th Cir. 1988)…roversy. Kearns has been transferred and sentenced; the matter is moot. Cf. Burrus v. Turnbo, 743 F. 2d 693 (9th Cir.1984) (affirming injunction against transfer of federal prisoner in violation of the IAD), vacated as moot sub nom. Hijar v. Burrus, 474 U.S. 1016, 106 S.Ct. 562, 88 L.Ed.2d 548 (1985).3 Similarly, because there is no indication in the record that a detainer is currently lodged against Kearns, this Court has no reason to address his suggestion that he is entitled to habeas relief from any adve…
-
Ronney Lee Snyder v. Sumner, 960 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1992)…cument notifying one state (the sending state) that another state (the receiving state) wants to prosecute a prisoner that the sending state is holding.” Burrus v. Turnbo, 743 F. 2d 693, 696 (9th Cir.1984), vacated as moot sub nom., Hijar v. Burrus, 474 U.S. 1016, 106 S.Ct. 562, 88 L.Ed.2d 548 (1985); see also Hopper v. United States Parole Comm’n, 702 F. 2d 842, 846 (9th Cir.1982) (“In the legislative history of the IADA, ‘detainer’ is defined as a ‘notification filed with the institution in which a prisone…