DARLING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Redondo v. State, 558 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …ve been tainted by testimony relating to his codefendant; he is thus unable to demonstrate any prejudicial “spill-over” effect of that testimony. See United States v. Meester, 762 F. 2d 867 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Sawyer v. United States, 474 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 579, 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985) (to establish prejudice resulting from “spill-over” effect, defendant must demonstrate jury’s inability to make individualized determination as to each defendant). Affirmed.…
• United States v. Terzado-Madruga, 897 F.2d 1099 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …y prejudicial effect of evidence concerning the attempted murder of an alleged co-conspirator neither substantially outweighs its highly probative value nor is inherently unfair. Cf. United States v. Meester, 762 F. 2d 867 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 579, 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985) (evidence that certain conspirators killed a pilot who refused to return airplane until he was paid was relevant to the charge of drug conspiracy, and probative value of such evidence outweighed its prejudicial…
• United States v. Norton, 867 F.2d 1354 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …4 Rule [*1361] 404(b) deals only with acts committed by the defendant himself, not with crimes committed by other members of the conspiracy. See United States v. Meester, 762 F. 2d 867, 877 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Sawyer v. United States, 474 U.S. 1024, 106 S.Ct. 579, 88 L.Ed.2d 562 (1985); United States v. Bates, 600 F. 2d 505, 509 (5th Cir.1979). The purpose of the rule is to prevent the jury from considering evidence that the defendant has, at other times, committed bad acts to convict him of…