HOLLOWAY

v.

WALKER, JUDGE, 162D JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• U.S. Anchor MFG., Inc. v. Rule Indus., Inc., 7 F.3d 986 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …existence of such market power may, as a practical matter, remove the higher priced product from the broader market composed of its functional substitutes. See C.E. Services, Inc. v. Control Data Corp., 759 F. 2d 1241, 1246 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 604, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985) (holding that “a ubiquitous price differential of some 20-25%” between branded and unbranded services, combined with other Brown Shoe factors, could justify finding a separate market for the unbranded services a…
• McGAHEE v. N. Propane GAS Co., 858 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …. . Reducing the price to particular customers, as the evidence discussed supra nn. 5 & 6 suggests Northern Propane did, is sufficient to create a jury issue. C.E. Services, Inc. v. Control Data Corp., 759 F. 2d 1241, 1247 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 604, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985). . Although the record does not indicate supra-competitive prices in the Camilla district, about 20 percent of Northern Propane’s districts had "operating rates of return" of 18 percent or higher. Affidavit of…
• Gibraltar Savings v. Ldbrinkman Corp., 860 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …L.Ed.2d 947 (1982); Calloway v. Manion, 572 F. 2d 1033 (5th Cir.1978). . E.g., Hi-Line Elec. Co. v. DowCo Elec. Prod., 765 F. 2d 1359, 1362 (5th Cir.1985); C.E. Serv., Inc. v. Control Data Corp., 759 F. 2d 1241, 1248 n. 10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 604, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); Union Carbide Corp. v. UGI Corp., 731 F. 2d 1186, 1189-90 (5th Cir.1984); Cook Indus., Inc. v. Community Grain, Inc., 614 F. 2d 978, 980 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 952, 101 S.Ct. 356, 66 L.Ed.2d 216 (19…