RAMIREZ

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (U.S. 1989)
  …I therefore concur in the Court’s judgment of affirmance. * For cases showing the California courts’ willingness to decide §621 cases on a case-by-case basis, see, e. g., Michelle W. v. Ronald W., 39 Cal. 3d 354, 703 P. 2d 88 (1985), app. dism’d, 474 U. S. 1043 (1986); In re Lisa R., 13 Cal. 3d 636, 532 P. 2d 123, cert, denied sub nom. Porzuczek v. Towner, 421 U. S. 1014 (1975).…
• In re Dep't of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litig. Atl. Richfield Co. & Exxon Corp. v. State OF Alaska & U.S. Dep't of Energy, 945 F.2d 1575 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1991)
  …. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. [*1583] 130, 148, 102 S.Ct. 894, 907, 71 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982); Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. v. Lujan, 895 F. 2d 780, 789 (D.C.Cir.1990); Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State, 705 P. 2d 418, 438 (Alaska 1985), appeal dismissed, 474 U.S. 1043, 106 S.Ct. 774, 88 L.Ed.2d 754 (1986). No such surrender or waiver of a state’s right to tax was made in the FSA. Just as a contract must not be construed to abrogate a state’s sovereign power to tax, so too it must not be read or interpreted to wai…