BULLOCH ET AL.
v.
PEARSON ET AL.

U.S. | 1986-01-13
No. 85-581
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
474 U.S. 1048 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re AMENDMENT TO RULE 39, 500 U.S. 13 (U.S. 1991)
    …ivolous paid filings. Furthermore, we have the ability to exercise control over the paid docket under Rule 42.2, which provides for award of “just damages and single or double costs” in the case of a frivolous filing. See Hatch v. Reliance Ins. Co., 474 U. S. 1048 (1986); Hyde v. Van Wormer, 474 U. S. 992 (1985). These controls are not effective with reference to proceedings in forma pauperis. It is vital that the right to file in forma pauperis not be encumbered by those who would abuse the integrity of our…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw