CALL ET AL.

v.

CITY OF ALBANY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• Hess v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 513 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1994)
  …t important goals of the immunity of the Eleventh Amendment is to shield states’ treasuries____The purpose of the immunity therefore largely disappears when a judgment against the entity does not entail a judgment against the state.”), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1057 (1986). In sum, as New York and New Jersey concede, the “vast majority of Circuits ... have concluded that the state treasury factor is the most important factor to be considered . . . and, in practice, have generally accorded this factor dispositiv…
• Blum v. Witco Chem. Corp., 829 F.2d 367 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …the state law claims and to use the verdict as advisory on the ADEA pension claims. After trial, the district court adopted the jury verdict, in light of this court’s decision in Maxfield v. Sinclair Int’l, 766 F. 2d 788 (3d Cir.1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1057, 106 S.Ct. 796, 88 L.Ed.2d 773 (1986), that the amount of a front pay award is a jury question. The district court also denied the defendant’s post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, and later granted plaint…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Schlifke v. Seafirst Corp. & Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 866 F.2d 935 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …al ability to direct the actions of the people who issue or sell the securities.” 797 F. 2d at 494 (emphasis in original). Several circuits have adopted the two-prong test introduced in Metge v. Baehler, 762 F. 2d 621 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1057, 106 S.Ct. 798, 88 L.Ed.2d 774 (1986), requiring the plaintiff to establish “that the defendant lender actually participated in (i.e., exercised control over) the operations of the [borrowing entity] in general.... [and] that the defendant possessed…

  ← 1 / 2 →